online prescription solutions
online discount medstore
pills online
buy lorazepam without prescription
xanax for sale
buy xanax without prescription
buy ambien without prescription
ambien for sale
buy modafinil without prescription
buy phentermine without prescription
modafinil for sale
phentermine for sale
lorazepam for sale
buy lexotan without prescription
bromazepam for sale
xenical for sale
buy stilnox without prescription
valium for sale
buy prosom without prescription
buy mefenorex without prescription
buy sildenafil citrate without prescription
buy adipex-p without prescription
librium for sale
buy restoril without prescription
buy halazepam without prescription
cephalexin for sale
buy zoloft without prescription
buy renova without prescription
renova for sale
terbinafine for sale
dalmane for sale
buy lormetazepam without prescription
nobrium for sale
buy klonopin without prescription
priligy dapoxetine for sale
buy prednisone without prescription
buy aleram without prescription
buy flomax without prescription
imovane for sale
adipex-p for sale
buy niravam without prescription
seroquel for sale
carisoprodol for sale
buy deltasone without prescription
buy diazepam without prescription
zopiclone for sale
buy imitrex without prescription
testosterone anadoil for sale
buy provigil without prescription
sonata for sale
nimetazepam for sale
buy temazepam without prescription
buy xenical without prescription
buy famvir without prescription
buy seroquel without prescription
rivotril for sale
acyclovir for sale
loprazolam for sale
buy nimetazepam without prescription
buy prozac without prescription
mogadon for sale
viagra for sale
buy valium without prescription
lamisil for sale
camazepam for sale
zithromax for sale
buy clobazam without prescription
buy diflucan without prescription
modalert for sale
diflucan for sale
buy alertec without prescription
buy zyban without prescription
buy serax without prescription
buy medazepam without prescription
buy imovane without prescription
mefenorex for sale
lormetazepam for sale
prednisone for sale
ativan for sale
buy alprazolam without prescription
buy camazepam without prescription
buy nobrium without prescription
mazindol for sale
buy mazindol without prescription
buy mogadon without prescription
buy terbinafine without prescription
diazepam for sale
buy topamax without prescription
cialis for sale
buy tafil-xanor without prescription
buy librium without prescription
buy zithromax without prescription
retin-a for sale
buy lunesta without prescription
serax for sale
restoril for sale
stilnox for sale
lamotrigine for sale

Google Buzz: A Recap of the Controversy and the Current Legal Issues

Google’s launch last week of Buzz, its social networking tool for Gmail, raised a furor over its privacy effects. As the New York Times reports, many Gmail users were outraged that their Gmail address books were turned into a public contact list, viewable to everyone in their address books, in Buzz.  Furthermore, Buzz is opt-out rather than opt-in. Google automatically enrolled all Gmail users into Buzz without notice or opportunity to decline enrollment. This ill-starred launch has had a variety of consequences for Gmail users, ranging from dissatisfaction to potentially dangerous exposure of private information. It also has had, and may continue to have, legal consequences for Google itself, which we explore in this post.

Opting in vs. opting out, and the difficulties of opting out

Google automatically enrolled all Gmail users into Buzz without permission, rather than giving them the choice to opt in. Users could opt out after the automatic enrollment, but they could not avoid enrollment in the first place. And Google initially made things difficult and confusing for users who wished to opt out. The “turn off Buzz” button at the bottom of the Gmail inbox screen did not actually turn off Buzz unless the user deleted her Google profile and blocked her followers, as CNET reported. This initially confused many users although, as CNET explains here, Google has now made disabling Buzz much easier in response to complaints.

The cause of the outcry

One major cause for complaint was the way Google took users’ private e-mail address list and made them public in Buzz. The outrage over Google’s action highlights one of the few clear public-private boundary expectations that exist in online communications: we do not expect our e-mail communications or contacts to be known to our personal acquaintances.  On Facebook, those we have “friended” can generally see each other. But in e-mail, we do not expect each of our e-mail contacts to be made aware of each other simply because they’re in the same address book.  The myriad personal implications of this are obvious.  For example, people do not necessarily want their former significant others to know the e-mail addresses of their current partners. The consequences of this privacy breach can be severe: one blogger found her address book exposed to her abusive ex-boyfriend, as the New York Times reported. Furthermore, as the Times went on to explain, dissidents under authoritarian regimes have reason to fear their contacts being made available to any casual governmental monitor.

As Ars Technica commented, these problems arose directly from Google’s attempt to use information given by its users in a private context (e-mail) by linking it to a public service. Furthermore, Google also took public information (public Picasa Web Albums and Google Reader shared items) and connected it to users’ Buzz account. This made it likelier that the users’ Buzz contacts would see the albums or Reader items. Google defended this by saying the information was public anyway, but linking users’ public information to their social networking account still has consequences. Information that is not hidden behind a password may still be unknown to a user’s personal acquaintances, and the user may wish to keep it that way.  While technically Google “it was public already” defense may have some legal merit, it did not incur any good will from its users by failing to seek their permission on this issue.

Google’s response

Google has apologized and begun rolling back some of Buzz’s problematic features. Google got rid of the automatic creation of a Buzz contact list from users’ email accounts, made it easier to disable Buzz, and no longer automatically connects public Picasa Web Albums and Google Reader shared items to Buzz accounts. The response was both rapid and dramatic, which is a point in Google’s favor in the eyes of many complainants. However, because of the circumstances that made such a response necessary, Google’s critics are still not entirely satisfied.  

The legal repercussions

Google may have to face a class-action suit in federal court in San Jose, CA, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. Plaintiff Eva Hibnick of Florida is seeking to file the suit on behalf of all Gmail users whose account information was automatically linked to Buzz. The complaint accuses Google of unlawfully sharing personal information without permission, as ABC explains. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief from similar actions in the future, as well as unspecified monetary damages.

Furthermore, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) calls Google’s response inadequate, reports Digital Media Wire. EPIC argues that Google Buzz should be opt-in, rather than opt-out. Google’s most recent changes have made it much easier for users to opt out of Buzz, but they still must opt out. Additionally, EPIC argues that Buzz should not have access to Gmail address books. EPIC has also filed a request with the Federal Trade Commission to investigate Google Buzz.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has also sharply criticized Google Buzz. The EFF’s arguments go beyond the immediate impact of the Buzz features and suggest that courts should be more skeptical of the Google Books settlement. As the EFF points out, a BBC report suggests that Google did not properly test Buzz before launching it. As Google tries to finalize its Books settlement, as the BBC reports, the problematic Buzz launch suggests Google might use Books information for its own competitive advantage in the same way it used Gmail information. The EFF argues that the Buzz incident highlights the need for Google to make “firm enforceable commitments to protecting user privacy.”

The future

Buzz might be doing better than one might anticipate given the uproar. The New York Times reports that Google claims “tens of millions of people” tried Buzz in the first two days after its launch. Google competitors Microsoft (as MediaBistro reports) and Yahoo, meanwhile, are naturally pooh-poohing Buzz’s prospects. But one thing is clear. Google might get away with asking for forgiveness rather than permission while dealing with Google Books and other copyright law issues, but taking that cavalier approach to personal information is a different matter, even in an age of decreasing privacy. Google may be dealing with both the public relations fallout and the legal consequences of the Buzz launch for a long time.

About the Author

Anjali Bhat

Anjali is a 2L at Columbia Law School.
  • http://www.stlr.org/2010/02/stlr-link-roundup-february-19-2010/ STLR Link Roundup – February 19, 2010

    [...] controversy surrounding Google’s Buzz is not confined to the U.S. (see our post): the Canadian Office of the Privacy Commissioner is also taking a look, says CBC [...]

  • http://www.jazzpixie.com/?p=324 Controversies in Public Relations | Jazz Pixie

    [...] Google Buzz: asking forgiveness rather than permission [...]

  • http://czechfirm.com/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | czechfirm.com

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://123tourism.com/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | 123tourism.com

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://feminelive.com/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | feminelive.com

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://playboyslive.com/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | playboyslive.com

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://iqblog.cz/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | iqblog.cz

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://hash1.org/theverge/20130525/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shut-down-its-failed-social-network-buzz.html Google takes the ‘last step’ to shut down its failed social network Buzz | Cyber security labs by Cipher Net AB

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://nalad.cz/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | nalad.cz

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://1tourism.com/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | 1tourism.com

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://carstop.eu/google-takes-the-last-step-to-shutdown-its-failed-social-network-buzz/ Google takes the ‘last step’ to shutdown its failed social network Buzz | carstop.eu

    [...] the days following its release, Buzz was caught up in a privacy controversy as confused Gmail users (who had never signed up for Buzz) found their email contact lists were [...]

  • http://adamvoyton.wordpress.com/2014/05/14/to-be-a-cloud-computing-user-or-not-to-be-that-is-the-question/ To be (a cloud computing user), or not to be: that is the question. | Adam Voyton – Writing, Technology, and Ideas

    [...] to consent to sharing data? Personally, I love Google and its products, but remember the Google Buzz controversy? Google obviously doesn’t have a perfect track record when it comes to privacy. Even though [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus