<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tissue Rights and Ownership: Is a Cell Line a Research Tool or a Person?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stlr.org/2010/03/tissue-rights-and-ownership-is-a-cell-line-a-research-tool-or-a-person/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stlr.org/2010/03/tissue-rights-and-ownership-is-a-cell-line-a-research-tool-or-a-person/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stlr.org/2010/03/tissue-rights-and-ownership-is-a-cell-line-a-research-tool-or-a-person/comment-page-1/#comment-15233</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stlr.org/?p=868#comment-15233</guid>
		<description>As technology advances so should the legality (aka informed consent). But even with informed consent, there is disagreement over what to include and exclude. However the technologies that have come out of human health have been good. Even now scientists know how to wash out the cellular data(dna)  of an organ and the cells themselves and leave the proteins that form the structure in tact. This in turn would theoretically reduce the likelihood of rejection because it would be the patients cells and DNA used and only the donors proteins (scaffolding/structure) to lay the cells on. Weird but cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As technology advances so should the legality (aka informed consent). But even with informed consent, there is disagreement over what to include and exclude. However the technologies that have come out of human health have been good. Even now scientists know how to wash out the cellular data(dna)  of an organ and the cells themselves and leave the proteins that form the structure in tact. This in turn would theoretically reduce the likelihood of rejection because it would be the patients cells and DNA used and only the donors proteins (scaffolding/structure) to lay the cells on. Weird but cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.stlr.org/2010/03/tissue-rights-and-ownership-is-a-cell-line-a-research-tool-or-a-person/comment-page-1/#comment-14962</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stlr.org/?p=868#comment-14962</guid>
		<description>I appreciate scientific advancement, which I see as the pursuit of Truth.  However, let us not omit respect for our humanity in applied science. I am an organ donor with interests in the potential of preserving or enhancing the life of another human being through the giving of my organs when I am no longer in need of them. However, I would not appreciate my cells being used as experimental springboards in cloning, or other such endeavors.  In other words, I don&#039;t want to do junior high again, either as myself, or a startling facsimile of me. Thus, I now feel compelled to review the conditions and the laws which govern organ donations.  Can they be used for &quot;science&quot;? Is somebody going to grow me in a test tube so that only paying taxes, but not death, is a sure thing?
In this case, I disagree with the California Supreme Court. It certainly suggests the wisdom in reading that fine print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate scientific advancement, which I see as the pursuit of Truth.  However, let us not omit respect for our humanity in applied science. I am an organ donor with interests in the potential of preserving or enhancing the life of another human being through the giving of my organs when I am no longer in need of them. However, I would not appreciate my cells being used as experimental springboards in cloning, or other such endeavors.  In other words, I don&#8217;t want to do junior high again, either as myself, or a startling facsimile of me. Thus, I now feel compelled to review the conditions and the laws which govern organ donations.  Can they be used for &#8220;science&#8221;? Is somebody going to grow me in a test tube so that only paying taxes, but not death, is a sure thing?<br />
In this case, I disagree with the California Supreme Court. It certainly suggests the wisdom in reading that fine print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

