online prescription solutions
online discount medstore
pills online
buy lorazepam without prescription
xanax for sale
buy xanax without prescription
buy ambien without prescription
ambien for sale
buy modafinil without prescription
buy phentermine without prescription
modafinil for sale
phentermine for sale
lorazepam for sale
buy lexotan without prescription
bromazepam for sale
xenical for sale
buy stilnox without prescription
valium for sale
buy prosom without prescription
buy mefenorex without prescription
buy sildenafil citrate without prescription
buy adipex-p without prescription
librium for sale
buy restoril without prescription
buy halazepam without prescription
cephalexin for sale
buy zoloft without prescription
buy renova without prescription
renova for sale
terbinafine for sale
dalmane for sale
buy lormetazepam without prescription
nobrium for sale
buy klonopin without prescription
priligy dapoxetine for sale
buy prednisone without prescription
buy aleram without prescription
buy flomax without prescription
imovane for sale
adipex-p for sale
buy niravam without prescription
seroquel for sale
carisoprodol for sale
buy deltasone without prescription
buy diazepam without prescription
zopiclone for sale
buy imitrex without prescription
testosterone anadoil for sale
buy provigil without prescription
sonata for sale
nimetazepam for sale
buy temazepam without prescription
buy xenical without prescription
buy famvir without prescription
buy seroquel without prescription
rivotril for sale
acyclovir for sale
loprazolam for sale
buy nimetazepam without prescription
buy prozac without prescription
mogadon for sale
viagra for sale
buy valium without prescription
lamisil for sale
camazepam for sale
zithromax for sale
buy clobazam without prescription
buy diflucan without prescription
modalert for sale
diflucan for sale
buy alertec without prescription
buy zyban without prescription
buy serax without prescription
buy medazepam without prescription
buy imovane without prescription
mefenorex for sale
lormetazepam for sale
prednisone for sale
ativan for sale
buy alprazolam without prescription
buy camazepam without prescription
buy nobrium without prescription
mazindol for sale
buy mazindol without prescription
buy mogadon without prescription
buy terbinafine without prescription
diazepam for sale
buy topamax without prescription
cialis for sale
buy tafil-xanor without prescription
buy librium without prescription
buy zithromax without prescription
retin-a for sale
buy lunesta without prescription
serax for sale
restoril for sale
stilnox for sale
lamotrigine for sale

Reducing Patent Backlog by International Cooperation

Patent backlog in recent years has become a serious problem for the USPTO. In 2011, the patent backlog amounts 640,491. According to the patent Director David Kappos, the goal is to have the patent load down to about 330,000 by 2015, with an average process taking about 20 months. Patent backlog poses serious obstacles for inventors to fully use their inventions, and thus dampens their incentives to innovate. This is especially true nowadays since technologies change faster and faster. An invention may well be past its time of being a leader in the industry by the time a patent is issued. The problem is more serious for entrepreneurial inventors, who lack the resources to massively produce the invention and hope to license it to big companies. Without patent protection, they have little to protect themselves with or bargain with potential manufacturers. Luckily, the US is not on its own. It can use the help from other intellectual property offices (who also suffer from patent backlog) to solve patent backlog together.

On Nov. 16, 2011, a coalition of the world’s five largest patent offices – the IP5 – announced the upcoming release of the IP5 Statistics Report 2011 Edition (which is not available to the public yet). The IP5 comprises the U.S. Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), and the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (SIPO). The IP5 Offices, which together handle about 90% of the world’s patent applications, is working together to explore ways to optimize their joint efforts to improve quality and efficiency of the examination process and to explore and optimize work sharing opportunities between the Offices.

The IP5 have been engaged in ten collaborative projects that were devised to harmonize the search and examination environment of each office and to standardize the information-sharing process. For example, the Common Access to Search and Examination Results project aims at building a service by which examiners of the IP5 will be able to refer to related dossier information of other offices in one stop, and proceed with the examination taking into consideration the search/examination results, cited documents and classifications of other Offices. In the Common Training Policy project, the IP5 aims at enhancing the trust among the IP5 Offices with regard to the mutual utilization of examination results. Just on Oct. 26, 2012, the fourth IP5 Examiners’ Workshop, hosted by the State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C., closed in Beijing. It provided examiners from the IP5 offices with an opportunity to discuss the topics of searching, prior art, novelty and inventive step, based on common patent applications in the fields of chemistry, mechanics and electricity.

That being said, the work sharing scheme will only be applicable to patent prosecution under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). While the PCT provides a valuable way to protect an invention internationally, if one decides to pursue patent in only a few countries, PCT applications tend to be more complicated, time consuming and expensive than filing applications separately in each country. It is worthwhile to explore the possibility of sharing documents and search results among the IP5 Offices beyond PCT applications. Limiting the sharing to documents and search results only can reduce the concern that an applicant will be unfairly prejudiced in one office because his application is rejected by another. It can also save an examiner substantial time and improve examination quality by giving him a second prior art search result for reference.

 

About the Author

Meiqiang Cui

Meiqiang Cui is a Staffer for the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review. She is a 2L at Columbia Law School.
blog comments powered by Disqus