online prescription solutions
online discount medstore
pills online
buy lorazepam without prescription
xanax for sale
buy xanax without prescription
buy ambien without prescription
ambien for sale
buy modafinil without prescription
buy phentermine without prescription
modafinil for sale
phentermine for sale
lorazepam for sale
buy lexotan without prescription
bromazepam for sale
xenical for sale
buy stilnox without prescription
valium for sale
buy prosom without prescription
buy mefenorex without prescription
buy sildenafil citrate without prescription
buy adipex-p without prescription
librium for sale
buy restoril without prescription
buy halazepam without prescription
cephalexin for sale
buy zoloft without prescription
buy renova without prescription
renova for sale
terbinafine for sale
dalmane for sale
buy lormetazepam without prescription
nobrium for sale
buy klonopin without prescription
priligy dapoxetine for sale
buy prednisone without prescription
buy aleram without prescription
buy flomax without prescription
imovane for sale
adipex-p for sale
buy niravam without prescription
seroquel for sale
carisoprodol for sale
buy deltasone without prescription
buy diazepam without prescription
zopiclone for sale
buy imitrex without prescription
testosterone anadoil for sale
buy provigil without prescription
sonata for sale
nimetazepam for sale
buy temazepam without prescription
buy xenical without prescription
buy famvir without prescription
buy seroquel without prescription
rivotril for sale
acyclovir for sale
loprazolam for sale
buy nimetazepam without prescription
buy prozac without prescription
mogadon for sale
viagra for sale
buy valium without prescription
lamisil for sale
camazepam for sale
zithromax for sale
buy clobazam without prescription
buy diflucan without prescription
modalert for sale
diflucan for sale
buy alertec without prescription
buy zyban without prescription
buy serax without prescription
buy medazepam without prescription
buy imovane without prescription
mefenorex for sale
lormetazepam for sale
prednisone for sale
ativan for sale
buy alprazolam without prescription
buy camazepam without prescription
buy nobrium without prescription
mazindol for sale
buy mazindol without prescription
buy mogadon without prescription
buy terbinafine without prescription
diazepam for sale
buy topamax without prescription
cialis for sale
buy tafil-xanor without prescription
buy librium without prescription
buy zithromax without prescription
retin-a for sale
buy lunesta without prescription
serax for sale
restoril for sale
stilnox for sale
lamotrigine for sale

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules that Warrants are Required to Electronically Track Cell Phone Data

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently held that law enforcement officials must obtain a warrant before electronically tracking a suspect’s cell phone. In State v. Earls, the court stressed that users are entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy in the level of detail cell phone data can reveal about their lives. This holding applies both to tracking using data from cell towers and tracking using GPS technology from the cell phones themselves.

The court found that cell phone owners had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data from their phones because, “no one buys a cell phone to share detailed information . . . with the police.” Earls is the first case to establish a constitutional right to privacy in location data since the United States Supreme court decided United States v. Jones in 2012. In Jones, the Supreme Court held that the installation of a GPS tracking device on a suspect’s vehicle without a warrant was unlawful under the Fourth Amendment because it constituted a trespass onto private property.

The Earls decision echoed Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in Jones which emphasized that the Fourth Amendment requires that police obtain a warrant whenever the government violates a subjective expectation of privacy and which suggested that a suspect has such an expectation of privacy in the GPS data from his or her vehicle. In Earls, the New Jersey Supreme Court reiterated Justice Sotomayor’s concerns over warrantless access to locational information and warned that the information gained from cell phone providers could reveal the people and groups with whom suspects were affiliated, as well as where they went and when they chose to go there.

The Earls decision goes further than Supreme Court precedent and federal law in protecting privacy rights. The information at issue in Earls came from the suspect’s cell phone service provider and cell tower data. According to the Supreme Court, the Fourth Amendment does not protect information such as spending records held by banks and calling records held by phone service providers. The United States Constitution therefore does not require a search warrant for the data at issue in Earls. However, in Earls the New Jersey Supreme Court read the New Jersey State Constitution as protecting reasonable privacy interests in such records held by third parties, and so a warrant or proof of a warrant exception is required before such records may be searched under New Jersey law.

The decision requiring warrants will only apply in Earls and in future cases, and the New Jersey Supreme Court allowed a thirty day delay in the implementation of the warrant requirement so that the New Jersey Attorney General has time to change current procedures regarding searches of cell phone data.

About the Author

Stephanie Piper

Stephanie Piper is a Notes Editor for the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review. She is a 3L at Columbia Law School.
blog comments powered by Disqus