online prescription solutions
online discount medstore
pills online
buy lorazepam without prescription
xanax for sale
buy xanax without prescription
buy ambien without prescription
ambien for sale
buy modafinil without prescription
buy phentermine without prescription
modafinil for sale
phentermine for sale
lorazepam for sale
buy lexotan without prescription
bromazepam for sale
xenical for sale
buy stilnox without prescription
valium for sale
buy prosom without prescription
buy mefenorex without prescription
buy sildenafil citrate without prescription
buy adipex-p without prescription
librium for sale
buy restoril without prescription
buy halazepam without prescription
cephalexin for sale
buy zoloft without prescription
buy renova without prescription
renova for sale
terbinafine for sale
dalmane for sale
buy lormetazepam without prescription
nobrium for sale
buy klonopin without prescription
priligy dapoxetine for sale
buy prednisone without prescription
buy aleram without prescription
buy flomax without prescription
imovane for sale
adipex-p for sale
buy niravam without prescription
seroquel for sale
carisoprodol for sale
buy deltasone without prescription
buy diazepam without prescription
zopiclone for sale
buy imitrex without prescription
testosterone anadoil for sale
buy provigil without prescription
sonata for sale
nimetazepam for sale
buy temazepam without prescription
buy xenical without prescription
buy famvir without prescription
buy seroquel without prescription
rivotril for sale
acyclovir for sale
loprazolam for sale
buy nimetazepam without prescription
buy prozac without prescription
mogadon for sale
viagra for sale
buy valium without prescription
lamisil for sale
camazepam for sale
zithromax for sale
buy clobazam without prescription
buy diflucan without prescription
modalert for sale
diflucan for sale
buy alertec without prescription
buy zyban without prescription
buy serax without prescription
buy medazepam without prescription
buy imovane without prescription
mefenorex for sale
lormetazepam for sale
prednisone for sale
ativan for sale
buy alprazolam without prescription
buy camazepam without prescription
buy nobrium without prescription
mazindol for sale
buy mazindol without prescription
buy mogadon without prescription
buy terbinafine without prescription
diazepam for sale
buy topamax without prescription
cialis for sale
buy tafil-xanor without prescription
buy librium without prescription
buy zithromax without prescription
retin-a for sale
buy lunesta without prescription
serax for sale
restoril for sale
stilnox for sale
lamotrigine for sale

STLR Link Roundup – November 2, 2013

WTO Rules against China in Rare Mineral Earths Case

Chinese government officials announced this Wednesday that the World Trade Organization has ruled against China’s export duties on rare earths. In doing so, the WTO dispute settlement panel basically upheld the joint claim by the United States, the European Union and Japan, questioning Beijing’s policy of limiting the amounts of rare earths it makes available to the international market as a violation of WTO rules. The United States, the European Union and Japan had jointly filed the complaint with the WTO in March 2012 after efforts to resolve the issue through bilateral talks proved unsuccessful.

China’s rare earth policy has long been a matter of concern for the international community because China controls 97% of the world’s rare earth market. While viable alternative rare earths remain elusive, they are essential for the high-tech and defense industries. Beijing first enforced restrictions on rare earths exports in 2010, saying it had the right to cut export quotas to preserve exhaustible resources. China had offered to ease export restrictions in 2011, but the international community demanded abolition of all restrictions.

The WTO panel said that China’s export duties on rare earths run counter to an agreement on the abolition of export duties that China adopted upon joining the WTO in 2001. While the ruling is not expected to be formally released until November, China is opposing publication of the report. In the meantime, China is expected to appeal the ruling. The case is also notable for being Japan’s first direct complaint against China through the WTO dispute settlement system.

Google and Android Smartphone Manufacturers Sued for Infringement of former Nortel Patents

Rockstar, a consortium jointly owned by Apple, Microsoft, Sony, RIM and Ericsson and the holder of the rights to former Nortel Patents, filed a barrage of patent lawsuits against Google and Android smartphone manufacturers including Samsung. Rockstar had spent $4.5 billion buying the thousands of patents owned by the bankrupt telecoms company Nortel in 2009. Google was one of the parties that lost out in the bidding war – ultimately offering as high as $4.4 billion.

The complaint against Google involves six patents (one of which is U.S. Patent No. 6,098,065 – the oldest patent in the case), all titled “Associative Search Engine” and under the same inventors. They cover technology that helps to match Internet search terms with relevant advertising, the core of Google’s search business. The complaint also tries to use against Google the fact that Google had previously bid for the rights of the patents.

Google’s failure to obtain the Nortel patents was seen as one of the principle factors that led to its purchase of Motorola Mobility in 2011. The Motorola acquisition gives Google some extra patents with which to go to battle. Google also has been shown to vigorously defend patent infringement attacks, as just last year it successfully saved Android in a court battle with Oracle.

Antigua and Barbuda Moving Forward to Monetize Suspended U.S. Copyright Protection under WTO Authorization

The government of Antigua and Barbuda, following a WTO panel ruling, is now pursuing a monetization scheme that would create a local market for United States copyrighted material free of royalties to the U.S. copyright holders. The ruling was the result of a complaint filed by the Caribbean country in 2003 claiming that the implementation of measures by the U.S. government restricting the market for cross-border gambling services is a trade violation.

Specifically, the WTO panel found that “[t]hree US federal laws (the Wire Act, the Travel Act and the Illegal Gambling Business Act) and the provisions of four US state laws … on their face, prohibit one, several or all means of delivery included in … cross-border supply … contrary to the United States’ specific market access commitments for gambling and betting services.” The WTO essentially authorized Antigua and Barbuda to suspend its TRIPs obligations with respect to United States intellectual property at the expense of copyright holders in the United States.

The U.S. ban on cross-border gambling services had greatly hurt Antigua and Barbuda’s economy. As a result, the exploitation of the suspended U.S. copyright protections is seen partly as retaliation by the Antigua and Barbuda government for the economic harm that it suffered.

About the Author

Min Su Chung

Min Su Chung is a Staffer for the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review. He is a 2L at Columbia Law School.
blog comments powered by Disqus