<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Columbia Science and Technology Law Review &#187; adwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stlr.org/tag/adwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stlr.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:21:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>STLR Link Roundup &#8211; April 9, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.stlr.org/2010/04/stlr-link-roundup-april-9-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stlr.org/2010/04/stlr-link-roundup-april-9-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stlr.org/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest on the STLR radar: The British Parliament has approved a law authorizing temporary suspension of internet access for those accused of repeated copyright infringement, reports the New York Times. Opponents of the law, such as the Open Rights Group, promise to turn this into an election issue in Great Britain. Canadian company Wi-Lan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest on the STLR radar:</p>
<ul>
<li>The British Parliament has approved a law authorizing temporary  suspension of internet access for those accused of repeated copyright  infringement, reports the <a id="vp2:" title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/09/technology/09piracy.html?ref=technology">New York Times</a>. Opponents of the  law, such as the <a id="ssm9" title="Open Rights Group" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/">Open Rights Group</a>, promise to turn this  into an election issue in Great Britain.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Canadian company Wi-Lan has filed suit in the Eastern District of Texas  against 19 high-tech companies—including heavyweights Apple, Dell,  Motorola, Acer, and others—for allegedly violating its Bluetooth  patents, reports <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-09/wi-lan-sues-apple-dell-motorola-over-its-bluetooth-patents.html">Business  Week</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>From <a id="nctx" title="Wired" href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/virtualpresence/">Wired</a>: a U.S District Court judge has given a  lawyer a 30-day sentence for contempt of court for encouraging people  to flood the judge&#8217;s e-mail account, to persuade him to side with the  lawyer&#8217;s client in a civil suit. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals is now  reviewing whether the judge had the authority to impose a contempt  sentence for conduct outside the physical courtroom.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned a 30  year computer ban for a sex offender, saying that the ban is  &#8220;substantively unreasonable&#8221; and &#8220;aggressively interferes with the goal  of rehabilitation,&#8221; reports <a id="puk8" title="Wired's Threat Level" href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/computer-ban/">Wired&#8217;s Threat Level</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The Electronic Frontier Foundation applauds the 2nd Circuit&#8217;s <a id="n0y3" title="decision" href="https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/tiffany_v_ebay/08-3947-cv_opn.pdf">decision</a> in Tiffany vs. eBay, finding  the online auction company not liable for contributory trademark  infringement on the basis of users selling items in Tiffany&#8217;s signature  blue boxes, but the digital rights organization <a id="eckx" title="worries about the lack of a statutory &quot;put  back&quot; procedure" href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/tiffany-v-ebay-what-about-put-back">worries about the lack of a statutory &#8220;put back&#8221;  procedure</a> in trademark law.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The <a id="eleg" title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/world/asia/08censor.html?ref=technology">New York Times</a> has a detailed  article explaining China&#8217;s internet censorship methods.</li>
</ul>
<ul></ul>
<ul>
<li>After a  federal court held that the FCC cannot impose network neutrality on ISPs  (as <a id="b6vr" title="PC World" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/193847/isps_vs_fcc_federal_ruling_is_blow_to_net_neutrality.html">PC World</a> discusses), the FCC declared  its intention to pursue its National Broadband Plan nevertheless. <a id="a-.e" title="CNET reports" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20002076-266.html">CNET reports</a> that the FCC considers the court&#8217;s  ruling to have forbidden one technical mechanism for achieving the  FCC&#8217;s goals, but not the goals themselves.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>From <a id="y9uc" title="eWeek" href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Arkansas-Mom-Charged-After-Hacking-Sons-Facebook-Account-256860/">eWeek</a>: an Arkansas woman faces misdemeanor  charges for posting slanderous messages on her teenage son&#8217;s Facebook  account.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has  found that Google&#8217;s AdWords program does not infringe the patent for a  bidding system determining pricing for ads on search results, <a id="ow-." title="Ars Technica" href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/04/appeals-court-rules-adwords-doesnt-infringe-bidding-patent.ars">Ars Technica</a> reports.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Mexico may disconnect millions of people&#8217;s cell phones for failure to  register their identities with the government via text message. This is  part of an attempt to fight crime by regulating cell phone use, <a id="pn2q" title="Reuters" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6375DT20100409?type=technologyNews">Reuters</a> reports.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stlr.org/2010/04/stlr-link-roundup-april-9-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
