Columbia Science and Technology Law Review » google books settlement

STLR Link Roundup – February 19, 2010

STLR — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:38:40 +0000

The latest on the STLR radar:

As it launches its cloud computing platform, Azure, Microsoft calls for federal regulation to clarify many of the open legal questions surrounding cloud computing, says the MTTLR Blog.

Ten years after it applies, TiVo is granted patent for season pass subscriptions, writes Gizmodo (see our recent post on TiVo’s patent battle with Microsoft here).

INFO/LAW recommends a Paul Ohm paper arguing that statistical techniques are eroding the effectiveness of anonymization of data, with great implications for privacy law.

The Third Circuit revives the hopes of Mr. and Mrs. Boring, who sued Google in trespass after a Google Street View car drove down their private driveway, writes Eric Goldman.

Ephemerallaw reports on the looming compliance deadline for the Massachusetts Data Security Law.

Rob Tiller of Red Hat argues for calling a troll a troll at Opensource.com’s law channel.

Mashable reports that the U.S. Department of Justice and the European Commission have given the go-ahead to the Microsoft-Yahoo deal that will see Yahoo’s search engine powered by Bing technology.

The controversy surrounding Google’s Buzz is not confined to the U.S. (see our post): the Canadian Office of the Privacy Commissioner is also taking a look, says CBC News.

Further afield, Indian IP blog Spicy IP considers whether the Indian Reprographic Rights Organisation (IRRO) might challenge the Google Books settlement, on the basis on India’s stricter “fair use” standard.

It’s not just China: European security and rights watchdog, the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe, calls on Turkey to reform or abolish its restrictive internet law.

And also in Europe, Out-Law gives a round-up of just-decided and upcoming litigation involving trademarks and keywords.

STLR Link Roundup – February 5, 2010

STLR — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:14:00 +0000

This week on the STLR radar:

Freedom to Tinker conducts a “census” of files shared through BitTorrent, finding 99% of them to infringe copyright.

From Business Week: a Pittsburgh couple is suing Google for trespass because Google posted pictures of their residence, including their pool and driveway.

Italy will hold YouTube liable for uploads that infringe copyright or are libelous, Ars Technica reports, which would eliminate “safe harbor” rules that protect websites with user-generated content in the U.S. and the E.U (see our post on the Italian case against Google for failure to take down an offensive video here).

The Washington Post reports that the National Security Agency will help Google determine the source of the cyber-attacks Google suffered a month ago, an alliance that raises concerns among civil liberties and digital privacy advocates. The Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the NSA for records of its relationship with Google.

The Justice Department considers the Google Books settlement to be improved but still flawed even after the latest revisions, the New York Times reports. The D.O.J. stated its continued dissatisfaction with the antitrust and intellectual property implications of the settlement. See Ars Technica for a detailed explanation.

Wired asks: do American high school and junior high students have online free speech rights? If so, to what extent? Current rulings leave the answer to that question unclear.

From Ars Technica: senators and representatives are unhappy with the proposed merger between Comcast and NBC Universal. At the Senate and House hearings on Thursday February 4th, several members of Congress expressed worry and skepticism over the merger’s implications for competition and consumers’ interests.

The Authors Guild says its favorable attitude to the Google Books settlement was a deliberate contrast to the Recording Industry Association of America’s (RIAA’s) aggressive approach to copyright enforcement, Wired reports.